XOXO
Gossip Girl
When I first began reading about
feminism and pop culture and about, the now called, “media literacy” I thought I was a sufficiently mature and capable person to see and understand the messages behind any Reality Show, Series and Advertisement.
However, this was not true. I proved it to myself when I finished reading a book named Feminism and Pop Culture and I decided I was going to watch a show and be a “media literate”. I decided to watch the series Gossip Girl -a series based upon the books written by the American novelist Cecily Von Ziegesar which focuses on the lives and romance of a group of wealthy teenagers who live in the upper east side of New York City- from a completely “Media Literate” perspective. The result? I ended simply watching Gossip Girl like any other time before. Why?

Well, I should have started with investigating what media literacy really is. After my failure I searched a clear definition and I found that media literacy is:
“The ability to access, analyze, evaluate and create media in a variety of forms.”
The previous definition is really straightforward. However I prefer the following one,
“Media Literacy is a 21st century approach to education. It provides a framework to access, analyze, evaluate, create and participate with messages in a variety of forms — from print to video to the Internet. Media literacy builds an understanding of the role of media in society as well as essential skills of inquiry and self-expression necessary for citizens of a democracy.”
The way I understand the previous definitions is by an analogy. I think media (Series, Movies, Advertisements, TV Shows etc..) are a Box of Candy and Media Literacy is the ability to read the nutritional table printed on the box.
Before we open a Box of Candy it is very intelligent to first read the Nutrition Facts. However, when we watch media we have to be reading and understanding that nutrition table at every single moment. It is not sufficient to only read it before watching a series, an advertisement or a reality show; in fact, it is almost- if not completely impossible.
On my first attempt to watch Gossip Girl as a “Media Literate” I didn’t see anything extremely wrong about it. What I saw in Gossip Girl were empowered women who obtained what they wanted and were not subordinated by their male counterparts. Then, after reading more about media literacy and how women are portrayed in pop culture I realized I was not seeing the small details, which made the big differences.
Having said so, for this particular case I’m going to focus on one of the main ingredients of the series: Blair Waldorf.

She is rich, successful, powerful, popular, and (most important) she seems to fit society’s definition of beauty (long hair, perfect skin, thin body) almost without trying.
At the beginning of the series Blair Waldorf was what Zeisler describes in her book Feminism in Pop Culture as: “The most stereotypically, beautiful, least independent women with the lowest-carb diets” In fact, we then learn that Blair has episodes of bulimia. She was insecure and she was always looking for male validation.
Although Blair experiences later on a change of behavior, interests and, in some cases, personality, which makes her a strong person who doesn’t need a man at her side (at least is what she is trying everybody else to convince of) she is still not getting where she wants to get in life.

This doesn’t only happen to her. It is a gender related denominator in Gossip Girl. The men in the show always get what they want, they get to have sex with many different girls without being judge and they are usually more successful in their careers than girls are. Clearly, Blair is more successful than other male in the show. But she is always less successful than “her equal”: Chuck Bass.
While Blair is absolutely dependent on her mother to buy her own things and is in repeated frustration for her attempts to attend a reputable University, Chuck Bass gets to own his personal hotel empire. This not only gives him the sufficient money needed to meet his standards of life but also gives him enough power to make look Blair as a completely helpless persona.
These characteristics shown in Gossip Girl strengthen the idea that women ought only to be pretty and dependent. Yes, they might be somehow successful, but they will never have as much money, power and freedom as their male counterpart. Are they telling us that women should stop trying so hard because, no matter what, they’ll never be fulfilled as women?
___________________________________________
Center for Media Literacy. "Media Literacy: A Definition and More." Center for Media Literacy. Center of Media Literacy, 2011. Web. 08 Oct. 2011.
Every Parent's Nightmare - Gossip Girl. Digital image. Cwtv.com. CWTV. Web. 8 Oct. 2011.
Zeisler, Andi. "Women Under The Influence: Pop Culture Now And Beyond." Feminism and Pop Culture. Berkeley, CA: Seal, 2008. 126. Print.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete1. My Audience is my 1101 English Class.
ReplyDelete2. Any advice and/or suggestions to improve my blog post?
1. television show
ReplyDelete2. the author mainly speaks about how her understanding of 'media literacy' changed her perspective on the show- 'gossip girl'. the main idea could be presented in a better way with lesser concentration on what media literate actually means.
3. the audience being this class are familiar with this topic and Ziesler and also with gossip girl to an extent. Hence the author is successful in writing to a specialized audience.
4. the first picture is inappropriately placed but other than that the visual elements are good. the first two paras can be improved. the comparison with chocolates and the ingredients is very innovative.
5. I have not watched gossip girl so i will not be able to answer that question well. but with what i read from this blog i believe they are depicted as independent and pretty woman but always at a level below their male counterparts.
1. What is the popular culture item they are talking about?
ReplyDeleteGossip Girl shows.
2. What is their main point? Copy and paste what you've identified as their main claim into comments section. How clear is the main idea?
The women in the show, specifically Blair, though appearing to be independent and powerful, really aren't.
3. Has the author taken their specialized audience into account?
Yes.
4. Are the visual elements well organized and effective? What could they improve?
They seem to be, mostly.
5. Any advice and/or suggestions to improve my blog post?
Make it a little more clear for people who have never watched the show.